Serious questions have been raised regarding the appointment of an official, Bharat Pachiya, to the position of Deputy Director at the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI). Concerns revolve around alleged discrepancies in eligibility criteria, documentation, and the overall selection process.
Experience and Pay Level Criteria Under Scrutiny
According to sources familiar with the matter, a recent review of the selection process reportedly found that the candidate’s submitted experience certificate and pay level did not meet the prescribed eligibility criteria. This has raised a key question: how was the appointment approved despite these apparent shortcomings?
Deviation from Mandatory Pay Level Requirement
The official recruitment notification had clearly specified Pay Level-10 as a mandatory requirement for the Deputy Director post. However, allegations suggest that the selected candidate was working at Pay Level-09 at the time of application.
This has led to concerns about whether recruitment rules were applied uniformly, or if exceptions were made without transparency or justification.
Concerns Over Private Sector Experience Documentation
Another issue raised pertains to the candidate’s private sector experience. The job advertisement reportedly required clear documentation of Cost to Company (CTC) to validate eligibility. Critics claim that no concrete supporting documents fulfilling this condition were submitted.
This has triggered further debate on whether due diligence was adequately conducted during the verification stage.
Questions on Role of Scrutiny Committee
Reports indicate that a scrutiny committee had flagged certain discrepancies during the evaluation process. Despite this, the appointment was allegedly finalized, and the official continues to hold a key position.
This development has led to broader concerns about accountability and transparency within the recruitment system.
Call for Transparency and Accountability
The controversy has sparked discussions among stakeholders regarding the integrity of appointments in regulatory bodies like FSSAI. Experts emphasize that institutions responsible for public health and food safety must maintain strict adherence to recruitment norms to uphold credibility.
Conclusion
While no official statement has yet clarified these allegations, the situation highlights the importance of transparent, rule-based recruitment processes in public institutions. Observers believe that a clear response from FSSAI could help address concerns and restore public trust.
📢 Be Aware, We never charge any consultancy fee for jobs.
📲 Foodtech Network WhatsApp Jobs Group
Click to join WhatsApp group
👥Free Membership (For Jobs, Internship and Training)
Membership registration
⚙️ Food Entrepreneurs & Startups (For business owners)
Our services (Free and Paid)
📱 Food safety training and certification.
Download our App, Foodtech Network
